Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold

Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold

Marsoni

M251S

$2103.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White GoldVintage 14k white gold brooch in a diamond branch design. Brooch has a bail attachment and can be worn as a pendant. ID#: BRO305 Diamonds: Seventeen (17) prong set, round brilliant cut and single cut diamonds measuring approximately 1. 7 2. 0mm each in diameter with an estimated loose weight of 0. 42ct. Twenty nine (29) pav set, graduated, round brilliant cut diamonds measuring approximately 1. 1 1. 8mm each in diameter with an estimated 0. 60 loose

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Vintage 2.82ct Diamond Branch Brooch in 14k White Gold in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

These pants are made of a material that seems durable and is definitely comfortable, and they have a stretch band at the waist that can comfortably accommodate many different belly girths-- from slim to portly. The waist also has a drawstring. I'd call these light weight pants, as the material is thin. They aren't baggy at all and fit the natural contours of an average male physique. The pants have two fairly deep front pockets and one small rear pocket that can easily fit a regular-sized wallet. But, I would not recommend carrying a wallet in the rear pocket, as, due to the depth of the pocket being only as deep as the wallet is long, it might slip out as you move around, sitting and rising. If nature calls, and you need to pee, you will have to pull your pants down and excite anyone in the immediate vicinity, as there is no opening, either buttoned or zippered, in the front of the pants. So, in that respect they are kind of like sweatpants. I'd call these pants good for inside the house or wearing on the street. I like them despite the lack of a fly, so I give 5 stars. I see lots of Chinese, Korean, and Japanese guys around who like to wear this type of pant, but these fit nicely for generally larger and more robust Caucasians type physiques as well. You don't have to worry about a belt or a broken fly zipper with these. Of course they are made in China, but due to their vast experience selling clothing to Americans, the manufacturers are well acquainted with big masculine American bodies and their needs.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2026

Verified Purchase

Don B_12073

Port Orchard, US

★★★★★ 5

Good product.

Color: Black, Size: 38

Good price and fits good. Would buy again

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2026

Verified Purchase

c. h. luke

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 4

Good fit

Color: Black, Size: 36

Comfortable and looks grey

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 15, 2026

Verified Purchase

SnowMan

Boise, US

★★★★★ 5

Perfect pants!

Color: Dark Gray, Size: 36

Absolutely wonderful pants that are so comfortable. I can travel in them or wear them as daily casual slacks for any event. I finally found pants that I enjoy that look great and are easy to care for. I’m gonna order more colors.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026